newyorkwolverine.com

Michigan football memories and more from a New Yorker's perspective.

Iโ€™ll say this, itโ€™s very difficult to pick against the spread. 

Not only did I think Clemson would beat LSU, but I figured the two opponents would drive the score well past the over/under. Instead, defense held sway, as Brian Kellyโ€™s team recorded quite possibly the biggest victory of his LSU tenure. 

In Miami, itโ€™s pretty obvious now that coach Mario Cristobal is building something. In an early season game that fanned the flames of the Notre Dame-Miami rivalry, the โ€˜Canes had just a little bit more than Notre Dame on both sides of the ball. Maybe itโ€™s the result of Notre Dameโ€™s offense waking up a little too late. Either way, the โ€˜Canes are 1-0, and the Irish are 0-1. That having been said, Notre Dame fans can take solace in the fact that the College Football Playoff now permits a team to make an early misstep, and then correct it later on. 

As always, t๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜†, ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐—ต๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด. 

Auburn 28, Baylor 24 (A -2; O/U: 58.5)

AUBURN 38, Baylor 24 (win)

Temple 26, UMASS 25, (T -2.5; O/U: 47.5)

TEMPLE 42, UMASS 10 (loss)

Clemson 37, LSU 33 (C -4; O/U: 55.5)

LSU 17, Clemson 10 (loss)

Notre Dame 24, Miami 21 (ND -2.5; O/U: 49.5)

MIAMI 27, Notre Dame 24 (loss)

(1 win, 3 losses, .250 winning percentage)

(Season record, 3 wins, 3 losses, .500 winning percentage)

Posted in

Leave a comment